V.H. Apelian's Blog

V.H. Apelian's Blog

Friday, June 12, 2026

Reforming higher education

Vaհe H Apelian. The entire department of world literature at the Yerevan State University is reportedly facing closure as apparent punishment for its chair Prof. Anush Sedrakyan’s participation, as a candidate, in last week’s parliamentary election. How sensationalized is the news, I am not sure. But I know America is facing serious issues in institutions of higher learning, be they private. I am not surprised that there are similar issued in Armenian state higher education. Here is what one University president wrote. ( https://www.ed.gov/about/homeroom-blog/making-universities-great-again-common-sense-approach-reforming-higher-education ) 

 

Making Universities Great Again: A Common-Sense Approach to Reforming Higher Education

NOVEMBER 24, 2025

By: Jonathan J. Sanford, Ph.D., President, University of Dallas

 

It’s no secret that Americans’ trust in universities, and in the value of a college degree, has declined dramatically. Tuition has soared as intellectual rigor has eroded. Classrooms have become battlegrounds for ideology rather than training grounds for reason. Many parents and policy makers, not surprisingly, wonder whether a college education is still worth it.

 

But if America is to remain strong and free, we cannot abandon our universities—we must restore them.

 

Governance Rooted in Principle, Not Politics

 

Sound governance starts with remembering why universities exist: to pursue truth and educate for freedom. Too many governing boards and administrators have traded that purpose for political posturing and bureaucratic conformity, mistaking activism for education and slogans for substance.

 

Leaders must act on principle, not partisanship, and uphold the university’s duty to truth and justice. Amongst other things, that means, as our Supreme Court has recently made clear, no preferences based on gender or race, no diversity quotas, and no fashionable ideologies that divide rather than unite. It also means restoring standardized testing and merit-based admissions as the fairest measures of preparation. Trustees and presidents must also reassert oversight of sprawling administrative bureaucracies whose priorities have strayed from the fundamental work of education.

 

A university that teaches responsibility must itself be responsible—transparent in budgeting, efficient in administration, and faithful to its mission. These are not culture-war slogans; they are the foundations of trust, accountability, and excellence.

 

Renewing the Core: The Foundation of Shared Civic Culture

 

At the University of Dallas, we’ve seen that a rigorous core curriculum is not an antiquated luxury but the very heart of a healthy institution. The liberal arts—literature, philosophy, theology, history, politics, mathematics, and the sciences—teach young people to think freely, reason well and live honorably.

 

When students engage in the great works of Western civilization—from Homer and Augustine to Shakespeare and Lincoln—they encounter the ideas that illuminate life’s enduring questions: What is good? What is true? How should I live?; rather than the propaganda all too common in modern textbooks. These shared texts, guided by professors who often themselves have been shaped by great books, form a common inheritance that unites students of different regions, races, and beliefs in friendship and an earnest search for truth and understanding. In the process, they learn not only how to think independently but how to disagree well.

 

That kind of education forms more than workers; it forms citizens—men and women capable of building families, businesses, and communities.

 

The Most Practical Preparation for Life

 

In recent decades, many universities have dismantled their general education subjects in favor of narrow, over-specialized degree programs. Others have distorted their liberal arts curriculum for the purpose of ideological indoctrination. Yet these trends have not produced wiser graduates or stronger citizens. A genuine classical, liberal arts education—one that forms both intellect and character—remains the most practical preparation for any vocation.

 

Far from hindering professional success, this kind of education develops the discipline, judgment, and strong communication skills every profession demands. At the University of Dallas, for example, our graduates are admitted to medical schools at more than twice the national rate—proof that excellence is achieved not despite breadth, but because of it.

 

As artificial intelligence reshapes the workplace, the habits cultivated by a liberal education—clear thinking, moral discernment, creativity, and articulate expression—will become even more essential. Machines can process data, but they cannot form judgment, empathy, or wisdom. Those belong to persons educated in the full sense of the word: men and women who know how to reason, converse, and lead.

 

Restoring Common Sense to Campus Life

 

Students do not need more administrative offices devoted to policing speech or mediating microaggressions. They need mentors—professors and deans who hold them to high standards while caring for their growth. Rules should be applied fairly and consistently, not selectively according to ideology.

 

Universities should expect adult behavior: civility, respect for property, and a commitment to free inquiry. Lawlessness on campus should never be excused as “expression.” The opportunity to articulate one’s disagreement is a right; vandalism is not. When a university tolerates intimidation or mob tactics, it fails in its duty to form citizens who can govern themselves.

 

Students thrive in communities with order, purpose, and friendship. And friendship—the ability to love what is true and good with others despite differences—is precisely what our nation lacks. A rigorous core curriculum, taught such that reason replaces resentment, cultivates this civic friendship better than any administrative initiative ever could.

 

Educating for Freedom and Responsibility

 

America’s founders believed liberty depends on virtue and knowledge. The same holds true for our universities. When education becomes merely technical, freedom decays into self-interest; when it becomes politicized, it breeds cynicism. But when it returns to its true end—the pursuit of wisdom—it strengthens both the soul and the republic.

 

Universities that govern themselves wisely—emphasizing academic excellence, character formation, and pragmatic career preparation—will regain public trust and thrive. Those that persist in ideological excess will continue to lose enrollment and credibility.

 

A Call for Renewal

 

The path forward does not lie in more bureaucracy or federal programs, but in a return to first principles: truth, virtue, freedom, and responsibility. Universities must again be places where ideas are vigorously but civilly debated, where excellence is rewarded, and where the next generation learns that disagreement need not destroy friendship.

 

If we can renew those habits within our universities, we might yet renew them within the nation itself. America became great because it united liberty with wisdom, enterprise with moral restraint. Our universities can once again help sustain that greatness—but only if they govern themselves with prudence and are animated from top to bottom by the love of truth.

 

 

Tuesday, June 9, 2026

The mandate is in the number of votes

Vaհe H Apelian  

 


Voting in Armenia closed at 8 pm, on Sunday June 7, 2026. Early hour of the next day, at around 1.30 am June 8, 2026, Nikol Pashinyan held a conference and conveyed that that he was informed that the election results indicated that the Civil Contract party was winning the election. He claimed that not only that the Civil Contract party was winning the election but that it was winning it with more of a mandate than in the previous election. He attributed the mandate to the Velvet Revolution remaining steadfast in its mission.

Basing my projection on his announcement, I estimated published by projected outcome of the election and posted it on my Facebook page with the following numbers as my projection: Civil Contract getting 59.5% of the votes, given that in the 2021 election, the Civil Contract had 53.95% of the votes. I also had estimated that the Strong Armenia party may get 20.5% of the votes, Armenia Alliance and Prosperous Armenia party may each get 10% of the votes. Obviously, my projection was wrong and the Civil Contract party ended up getting 49.85% of the votes.

Consequently, the argument may be put forth that the Nikol Pashinyan led Civil Contract has lost or is losing its mandate. During the June 2021 snap general election, Civil Contract had 53.95% of the votes. In 2026 election, Nikol Pashinyan led Civil Contract party had 49.85% of the votes. Where is the mandate then, a person may ask?

The number of votes cast. The total number of registered voters, the number of votes cast, the number of votes cast  in favor of Nikol Pashinyan led Civil Contract, percent of the voters who voted, and the percent of voters who cast in favor of Civil Contract are listed in the table below. The figures are from Wikipedia.

The number of voters who cast in favor of Nikol Pashinyan led Civil Contract party in 2021, was 668,761. In 2026, the number of voters who cast in favor of Nikol Pashinyan led Civil Contract was 727,820, which means compared to 2021 snap election, the Civic Contract has gained 59,059 votes.

Revolutions are transient. They tend to lose their momentum soon after. All revolutions I have come to know in history eventually fizzled out or morphed into something far different. All revolutions I know of suppressed the existing law and order and instituted their own. The Velvet Revolution is the only revolution I know of that held the existing law and order and attempts to bring about change in the existing law and order the Velvet Revolution took over. 

Although the Velvet Revolution has lost a sizeable number of voters since December 2018 snap general election, the argument may be made that Nikol Pashinyan led Civil Contract has kept its momentum, against all odds. 

 

 

Sunday, June 7, 2026

An unsettling criticism for a price Armenia can bear

 Vaհe H Apelian

Robert O. Krikorian PhD has recently posted an article in the online journal Keghar.com, titling it “Armenia needs to Challenge its Assumptions”. (June 3, 2026).

 Frankly speaking I was disappointed in the way Dr. Robert O. Krikorian treated in that article,  Armenia’s crossroad for peace existential initiative, especially after reading his academic credentials, academic experiences, and his “career as a diplomatic historian, focusing on the practical and policy-relevant applications of historical knowledge.” Armenia’s strategic initiative is not about what Turkey and Azerbaijan want; it is about what Armenia wants and strategizes to achieve.

Furthermore, considering Armenia’s history with its neighbors and the recent tragic experience losing historic Artsakh, I find, contrary to Dr. Robert O. Krikorian’s assumption, Armenia is challenging historic assumptions in an unprecedented way. I find the diplomatic headways Armenia has made remarkable, in spite that “Armenia has provided no evidence or reasoned analysis that Ankara and Baku want anything other than a weak and compliant Armenia to serve their own strategic interests”. For the very first time in recent history, Armenia’s borders including of course along Turkey and Azerbaijan, are now manned by Armenians only. And also “For the First Time Since Independence, Armenia Records 24 Months Without Border Fatalities; Thousands of Homes Being Built in Border Communities” (a Massispost.com quote). 

I invite Dr. Robert O. Krikorian ask and gauge the reactions of parents and relatives of citizens of Armenia who have a son or a daughter, a niece or nephew serving, or will be serving, Armenia’s armed forces and manning Armenia's borders.

I also found offensive that person of his caliper calls the Armenian Government a “regime.” Dr. Robert O. Krikorian knows that the current government came about by the consent of the citizens of Armenia, who elected Nikol Pashinyan led Civil Contract party in an orderly, transparent democratic election to govern Armenia.

There are a number of other issues Dr. Robert O. Krikorian raises, such as the Armenian prisoners in Baku, the destruction of Armenian monuments left behind in historic Artsakh, occupied lands in Armenia, aggressive statements coming from Baku. Yes, there will not come a time when Armenia will not confront serious issues or remain nonchalant in that tinderbox of a region. However, the following is unquestionable. Armenia was 29,743 square kilometers before Nikol Pashinyan came to power. Armenia is 29,743 square kilometers as Nikol Pashinyan strives again to be elected as the PM.

What also was disappointing to me, was his lack of suggestion as to how he proposes Armenia best strategizes its relations with its forever four bordering countries, given his unmistakable criticism of Nikol Pashinyan government. His concluding paragraph is evasive at best. “It is not too late, however, to reverse this troubling trend”, is not a statement that lays down a strategy. Reverse "the troubling trade", in favor of what? I invite readers to read it over again and rebut or rebuke me if I err in my assertions. 

Armenia is doing a remarkable job joggling conflicting interests. However, internal matters are exacerbating Armenia’s foreign policy and that is because of the lingering commissar hegemonic mentality and the safeguarding the ill-gotten wealth, and other de-stabilizing legacies of Soviet Socialist Union and its breakup. What exacerbates Armenian policy is the oligarchic remnants from the unprecedented plunder that turned the well-connected members of yesterday’s Soviet nomenklatura, onto fiscal barons be he Robert, Sezh, or Samvel.

Much like any strategy, crossroad for peace initiative exacts its price. But what strategic initiative does not exact a price? All do. But cross road for peace strategic initiative exacts a price Armenia can bear.  



 


 

Saturday, June 6, 2026

A disappointing article

Vaհe H Apelian


Robert O. Krikorian PhD has recently posted an article in the online journal Keghar.com, titling it “Armenia needs to Challenge its Assumptions”. (June 3, 2026).

 Frankly speaking I was disappointed in the way Dr. Robert O. Krikorian treated Armenia’s crossroad for peace existential initiative, especially after reading his academic credentials,  academic experiences, and his “career as a diplomatic historian, focusing on the practical and policy-relevant applications of historical knowledge.” Armenia’s strategic initiative is not about what Turkey and Azerbaijan want; it is about what Armenia wants and strategizes to achieve.

Furthermore, considering Armenia’s history with its neighbors and the recent tragic loss of Artsakh experience, I find Armenia, contrary to Dr. Robert O. Krikorian’s assumption, is challenging Armenian historic assumptions in an unprecedented way. I find the diplomatic headways Armenia has made remarkable, in spite that “Armenia has provided no evidence or reasoned analysis that Ankara and Baku want anything other than a weak and compliant Armenia to serve their own strategic interests” and by  ruling out war. For the very first time in recent history, Armenia’s borders including of course along Turkey and Azerbaijan, are now manned by Armenians only. And also “For the First Time Since Independence, Armenia Records 24 Months Without Border Fatalities; Thousands of Homes Being Built in Border Communities” (a Massispost.com quote). 

I invite Dr. Robert O. Krikorian ask and gauge the reactions of parents and relatives of citizens of Armenia who have a son or a daughter, a niece or nephew serving, or will be serving, Armenia’s armed forces and manning Armenia's borders.

I also found offensive that person of his caliper calls the Armenian Government a “regime.” Dr. Robert O. Krikorian knows that the current government came about by the consent of the citizens of Armenia, who elected Nikol Pashinyan led Civil Contract party in an orderly democratic election to govern Armenia.

What also was disappointing, was his lack of suggestion as to how he proposes Armenia best strategizes its relations with its forever four bordering countries, given his unmistakable implied criticism. His concluding paragraph is evasive at best. I invite readers to read it over again and rebut me if I err in my assertions. Vahe H Apelian PhD

Friday, June 5, 2026

Armenia: Happy voting on Sunday June 7, 2026

  Vaհe H Apelian


I was born and raised in Lebanon as a Lebanese national. I am now an American citizen. I have not renounced by Lebanese citizenship. I have not exercised by Armenia right of return and have not applied for Armenian citizenship. I do not intend to repatriate. Naturally I cannot vote in Armenian election. In the upcoming election, my favorite political party in Armenia i is the Civil Contract party. But I stand by and support any government the citizens of Armenia bring about by an orderly democratic election.

Throughout the past month, the relentless attacks on the PM Nikol Pashinyan, reminded me of Kristapor Mikayelian's, "Crowd Mentality – Ամբոխային Տրամաբանութիւն treatise. Kristapor Mikayelian’s famous treatise – Crowd Mentality - is quoted to this day. In it, Kristapor Mikayelian refuted the crowd mentality that follows the Latin phase "post hoc, ergo propter hoc" - after this because of this. He was refuting the mentality that attributed the mid 1890’s Hamidian massacres to the revolutionary organizations founded not even a decade earlier. Surprisingly, elements who uphold Kristapor Mikayelian’s treatise, nowadays do the same, attributing the depopulation of Artsakh solely to Nikol Pashinyan because it happened under his watch. 

Naturally not all in Armenia are carried by that false Nikol Pashinyan is the sole culprit for the loss of Artsakh, crowd mentality; especially the mostly young and upcoming generation in Armenia, some of whom were not even born on September 21, 1991. They remain rallying for Nikol Pashinyan. They played a decisive role in having NP elected in June 2021.  They are rallying for him for June 2026 election as well. Whether they will be able to carry the election or not, we will know in a day or two. But they have changed the narrative of the election.

Over the years I have gotten to know more about some of them, than others from the competing parties and alliances. I first heard the name Nikol Pashinyan on November 27, 2010 when the online journal Keghart.com ran “Free journalist Nikol Pashinyan” appeal. Subsequently I got to know about some of the other prominent members of the Velvet Revolution and presently Civil Contract party member. I wrote in my blog about them. I listed the links to these blogs, below.

Maybe on Monday, June 8, 2026 we will find out who carried the election. But I believe the mostly younger Armenians who brought about the Velvet Revolution have already changed the election narrative and further democratized election in Armenia. The election is now more about issues than about persons, although prominent persons are playing pivotal roles in the election.

Happy voting on Sunday June 7, 2026.

***

 

Link: The evolution of Hayk Konjoryan. https://vhapelian.blogspot.com/2025/06/the-evolution-of-hayk-konjoryan.html

 

Link: Vahagn Aleksanyan, a true role model. https://vhapelian.blogspot.com/2025/07/vahagn-aleksanyan-true-role-model.html

 

Link: Not all Armenian Americans treated Armenia’s Ambassador Lillit Makunts properly. https://vhapelian.blogspot.com/2025/08/not-all-armenian-americans-treated.html


 

 

 

 

 

Thursday, June 4, 2026

Armenia: A trend in exercising democracy

  Vaհe H Apelian

The citizens of Armenia are exercising democracy to the x th degree, it such a thing could be said. For a small country with a population of around 3 million, Armenia boasts abundant political entities. I say political entity because some are coalitions or alliance of different parties. An overabundance of political parties has a   major drawback.  The votes cast in favor of the parties or alliances that did not meet the threshold requirement, are absorbed by the parties or alliances that met the threshold. Consequently, it is recommended that fewer parties or alliances take part in the election. 

Nineteen – 19 – parties/alliance are vying for power during this upcoming election.  During June 2021 election, there were twenty-six – 26 - parties vying for power. That is to say, there are seven less parties in this upcoming election, from June 2021 election. Hopefully this will trend continue at the same rate.

If this trend continues, there will be 12 parties vying for power during June 2031 election. I think, 12 parties vying for power in Armenia is ample.